FALL-LANDING DOMAIN

Safe Landing Techniques

Safe landing techniques are strategies intended to help manage the impact of an unavoidable fall and reduce potentially harmful loading during contact with the ground.

They relate primarily to the fall-landing domain of falls efficacy and the perceived capability to protect oneself during a fall.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Safe-falling Practice Requires Appropriate Supervision

The material on this page is presented for research, education and professional discussion. Safe-landing techniques should not be interpreted as unsupervised instructions for people at risk of injury.

Individual health status, bone health, mobility, neurological function, previous injury, environment and physical capability should be considered before any practical fall-training activity.

OVERVIEW

What Are Safe Landing Techniques?

The techniques represented in this resource can broadly be considered as falling slaps, rolling strategies or combinations of both. The appropriate movement strategy can differ according to fall direction, momentum, environment and individual capability.

TECHNIQUE TYPE

Falling Slap

Techniques using a larger contact area during landing to distribute impact.

TECHNIQUE TYPE

Roll

Techniques that redirect movement and momentum through a rolling strategy.

TECHNIQUE TYPE

Combined Strategy

Techniques combining elements of rolling and impact management.

VIDEO LIBRARY

Safe Landing Techniques by Direction

The original Falls Efficacy resource brings together examples of different falling and rolling strategies. These videos demonstrate movement approaches rather than prescribing a universal technique.

FORWARD Forward Falling & Rolling Techniques

Forward Technique 1

Forward falling or rolling example

Forward Technique 2

Forward falling or rolling example

BACKWARD Backward Falling & Rolling Techniques

Backward Technique 1

Backward falling or rolling example

Backward Technique 2

Backward falling or rolling example

Backward Technique 3

Backward falling or rolling example

Backward Technique 4

Backward falling or rolling example

Backward Technique 5

Backward falling or rolling example

Backward Technique 6

Backward falling or rolling example

Backward Technique 7

Backward falling or rolling example

SIDEWAYS Side Falling & Rolling Techniques

Sideways Technique 1

Side falling or rolling example

Sideways Technique 2

Side falling or rolling example

Sideways Technique 3

Side falling or rolling example

Sideways Technique 4

Side falling or rolling example

GLOBAL PRACTICE

Safe-falling Programmes Around the World

Safe-falling strategies have been incorporated into programmes delivered in rehabilitation, exercise and martial-arts settings. Programme content, duration, progression and instructor background vary considerably.

SWEDEN

Judo4Balance

SINGAPORE

Geriatric Parkour

An innovative movement-based approach that uses adapted parkour activities to develop functional movement, confidence and physical capability in older adults.

UNITED KINGDOM

Finding Your Feet

British Judo programme developed to teach balance, safer falling and recovery skills using adapted judo principles.

British Judo

PROGRAMME COMPARISON

Examples of Structured Safe-falling Programmes

Programme Country Sessions Total Delivered by Techniques represented
NFPP Netherlands 5 × 2 · 90 min 15 h Physiotherapist Side breakfall, backward breakfall, forward rolling breakfall
Judo4Balance Sweden 10 × 1 · 45 min 7.5 h Judo instructor Side, backward and forward breakfalls; forward rolling breakfall
Rolling Good Times Singapore 6 × 2 · 90 min 18 h Fitness trainer Backward breakfall
FAST United States 4 × 2 · 30 min 4 h Judo instructor Side and backward breakfall
Finding Your Feet United Kingdom 8 × 1 · 60 min 8 h Judo instructor Backward and forward breakfall
JEP Australia 8 × 2 · 60 min 16 h Judo instructor Side, backward and forward breakfalls; side and forward rolling breakfalls

Programme characteristics are presented descriptively and should not be interpreted as evidence that the programmes are equivalent in effectiveness, safety or suitability.

RESEARCH EVIDENCE

What Does the Evidence Suggest?

Biomechanical research suggests that several landing strategies can alter impact loading during controlled falls. However, evidence varies according to falling direction and technique.

Importantly, much of the earlier evidence involved younger participants and self-initiated laboratory falls. Further research is required to determine the effectiveness, safety and transferability of these approaches for older people and unexpected real-world falls.

EVIDENCE

Landing strategy matters

Different strategies may influence biomechanical impact according to the direction and circumstances of a fall.

CAUTION

Not every technique performs similarly

Evidence should not be interpreted as demonstrating equal benefit across all safe-falling techniques.

RESEARCH GAP

Older adults require further study

Suitability for older and clinically vulnerable populations requires careful evaluation.

RESEARCH & ASSESSMENT

Potential Assessment of Safe-landing Ability

The original resource also considers potential ways to assess safe-landing and related functional abilities. These should presently be viewed as research or exploratory assessment approaches rather than established universal clinical tests.

Safe-falling technique assessment
Sitting-rising assessment example 1
Sitting-rising assessment example 2
Susceptibility to injury during a fall

FALLS EFFICACY

Safe-landing Confidence

The physical ability to perform a safer landing and the person’s confidence in their ability to protect themselves are related but distinct considerations.

Within the four-domain falls-efficacy framework, safe-landing confidence represents perceived capability during the fall-landing stage.

Researching Safer Ways to Manage Falls

Safe landing is one component of a broader approach to developing the confidence and capability to prevent and manage fall-related situations.