NEAR-FALL DOMAIN

Balance Recovery Confidence Scale

The Balance Recovery Confidence (BRC) Scale measures an individual’s confidence in recovering balance following a destabilising event such as a slip, trip or loss of balance.

It focuses specifically on perceived reactive balance recovery and is conceptually distinct from confidence in maintaining balance and from fear or concern about falling.

Balance Recovery Confidence Scale

THE CONSTRUCT

What Is Balance Recovery Confidence?

Balance recovery confidence refers to an individual’s perceived capability to regain stability and arrest a fall after balance has already been disturbed.

This corresponds to the near-fall stage of the falls-efficacy framework. The person is no longer simply trying to remain steady. Instead, a destabilising event has occurred and a reactive response is required to prevent the fall from progressing.

PRE-FALL

Balance confidence

Confidence in maintaining balance while undertaking activities.

RELATED CONSTRUCT

Fear or concern about falling

Emotional or cognitive concern about the possibility or consequences of falling.

WHY IT MATTERS

Why Assess Balance Recovery Confidence?

Traditional balance-confidence measures largely ask whether a person believes they can remain steady during activities. Balance recovery confidence addresses a different question: what does the person believe they can do once stability has already been lost?

Reactive rather than steady-state

The BRC focuses on perceived capability to respond to destabilising perturbations rather than simply maintain balance.

Person-reported perspective

It provides insight into how individuals judge their own balance-recovery capability.

Complementary information

BRC can be considered alongside measures of physical balance, balance confidence and concern about falling.

AVAILABLE VERSIONS

BRC-19 and Short-Form BRC

Two English versions are currently available: the original 19-item BRC and the 7-item Short-Form Balance Recovery Confidence Scale.

ORIGINAL SCALE

BRC-19

Comprehensive assessment of balance recovery confidence across different everyday perturbation scenarios.

Items
19
Response
0–10
Construct
Balance recovery confidence
Original population
Community-dwelling older adults

PRACTICAL USE

Administration and Scoring

Respondents should judge their current ability to recover balance if the situation described in an item were to occur. The focus is their perceived reactive capability, not how they might avoid the situation.

0

Cannot do at all

Represents the lowest level of certainty in being able to recover balance.

5

Moderately can do

Represents an intermediate degree of certainty.

10

Highly certain can do

Represents the highest level of confidence in being able to recover balance.

BRC-19 SCORE

Calculate the mean item score

Sum the responses across the 19 items and divide by 19. The resulting BRC score ranges from 0 to 10.

0 10
Lower balance recovery confidence Higher balance recovery confidence

Important when administering the BRC

If a respondent says that they would avoid the situation, become more careful or hold onto a support, redirect them to the intended question: how confident are they that they could recover their balance if the loss of balance actually occurred?

Respondents who normally use a walking aid should consider the scenario in the context of their usual use of that aid.

DEVELOPMENT

How the BRC Was Developed

Development combined input from older adults, clinical and research experts, and psychometric evaluation using both Classical Test Theory and Rasch Measurement Theory.

01

Item generation

Candidate content was generated with 12 community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older using a nominal group technique.

02

Content validation

The scale name, instructions, response options, recall period and items were reviewed by 28 healthcare professionals and 10 older adults using an e-Delphi process.

03

Psychometric evaluation

The resulting scale was evaluated in 84 older adults using self-reported and performance measures, factor analysis, Classical Test Theory and Rasch Measurement Theory.

MEASUREMENT EVIDENCE

Psychometric Properties

Published studies provide evidence supporting the measurement properties of both the original BRC and the more recent short-form version.

BRC-19

Unidimensional structure

The original development study supported interpretation of the 19 items as a unidimensional measure of balance recovery confidence.

BRC-19

Reliability

The original study reported high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.975) and test-retest reliability (ICC3,1 = 0.944).

SF-BRC

7-item short form

Initial validation supported a unidimensional structure, with Cronbach’s α = 0.94 and Rasch person-separation reliability of 0.93.

SF-BRC

Relationship with BRC-19

The SF-BRC showed a strong relationship with the original BRC in its development dataset (r = 0.99).

Measurement properties should be considered in relation to the population and context in which each study was conducted. Evidence from one population should not automatically be assumed to apply to all clinical groups.

GLOBAL USE

Translations and Cross-cultural Validation

The BRC research programme includes validated translations and ongoing cross-cultural adaptation projects across different countries and languages.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation should be distinguished from completed psychometric validation. Versions listed as “in progress” should therefore not yet be considered validated instruments.

View translation projects in progress
Persian
Lead: Yalda Beygi
Hong Kong Chinese
Lead: Annie Wu
UK English Adaptation
Lead: Yazeed Qashwa
Dutch (Belgium)
Lead: Zuhal Abasiyanik
Dutch (Flemish)
Lead: Zuhal Abasiyanik
Spanish
Lead: Zuhal Abasiyanik
Italian
Lead: Zuhal Abasiyanik
Hindi
Leads: Shefali Walia, Garima Wadhwa
Arabic (Oman)
Lead: Idris Al Blaushi
Estonian
Lead: Gleb Slyusarchuk
Russian
Lead: Gleb Slyusarchuk
Filipino
Lead: Donald Lipardo
Chinese (China) · SF-BRC
Lead: He Xuan

TRANSLATION COLLABORATION

Interested in translating or validating the BRC?

Please contact the BRC research team before commencing a new translation or cross-cultural adaptation. This helps identify existing projects, minimise duplication and support consistency across international BRC versions.

Contact the BRC Team

ACCESS

Access the BRC

The BRC is available for use by researchers and clinicians, provided that the scale and its developers are appropriately referenced.

OTHER LANGUAGES

Translated Versions

Browse validated and developing versions of the BRC across different languages.

CITATION

How to Cite the BRC

ORIGINAL BRC

Soh, S. L. H., Tan, C. W., Xu, T., Yeh, T. T., Abdul Rahman, F., Soon, B., Gleeson, N., & Lane, J. (2024). The Balance Recovery Confidence (BRC) Scale. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 40(3), 658–669.

View publication →

The article was first published online in October 2022 and subsequently appeared in Volume 40, Issue 3 in 2024.

SHORT-FORM BRC

Soh, S. L. H., Ang, C. W., Chan, C. Z. Y., Goh, R. X. L., Kuoh, J. J., Lim, Z. Y., Ting, H. X. T., Ho, J., Boonsinsukh, R., & Sattelmayer, K. M. (2026). Development of a short-form balance recovery confidence (SF-BRC) scale. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 10, e61.

View publication →

RESEARCH

Selected BRC Publications

Research continues to evaluate the BRC across populations, settings and languages.

SHORT FORM

Development of a short-form balance recovery confidence (SF-BRC) scale

Soh et al., 2026

Read publication →

CROSS-CULTURAL VALIDATION

Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Balance Recovery Confidence Scale in older Turkish adults

Read publication →

CLINICAL VALIDATION

Reliability and validity of the Balance Recovery Confidence Scale in persons with stroke

Read publication →

Collaborate on Balance Recovery Confidence Research

We welcome collaboration involving translation, cross-cultural validation, clinical application and further investigation of balance recovery confidence.